Download e-book for kindle: Behavioural Risks in Corporate Governance: Regulatory by Ngozi Vivian Okoye

By Ngozi Vivian Okoye

Recent circumstances of company disasters, together with the solving of LIBOR charges and funds laundering matters within the banking undefined, spotlight how behavioural matters at the a part of corporation administrators are major contributory elements in company governance and the good fortune or failure of businesses. This e-book examines how character and behavioural concerns have contributed to significant company mess ups, and the way this threat will be managed.

The booklet examines behavioural hazards in company governance, and evaluates the level to which danger administration mechanisms have stated a number of elements of behaviour. Drawing from circumstances within the united kingdom, the U.S. and Australia and examine in psychology and the behavioural sciences, Ngozi Vivian Okoye argues that present company governance mechanisms lack provision for settling on and handling character dangers, and indicates how constituent components of behaviour may be engaged with while constructing preventive mechanisms for company disasters. Okoye offers a conceptual framework for selecting and dealing with character dangers, and explores how character danger could be outfitted into company governance regulation.

The booklet could be of significant use and curiosity to researchers and practitioners in enterprise and corporate legislations, company governance, and important administration studies.

Show description

Read or Download Behavioural Risks in Corporate Governance: Regulatory Intervention as a Risk Management Mechanism PDF

Similar management books

Get Capacity Management Handbook, Monitor, Analyze, Tune, Manage PDF

Specialist technical roadmap to IT carrier potential administration with coverage, aim, Scope, enterprise Justification, aim, goal, function & accountability, KPI, conversation Plan & different organizational template assets.

Verspätete Projektabbrüche in F&E: Eine by Eric Zayer (auth.) PDF

Fehlschlagende Projekte - insbesondere im Umfeld von Forschung und Entwicklung - werden häufig erst wesentlich später abgebrochen, als eine reason, ökonomische Betrachtung empfehlen würde. Durch solche verspäteten Abbrüche entstehen Unternehmen jedoch hohe Effizienz- und Effektivitätsverluste. Da die klassisch-ökonomische Theorie dieses Phänomen nicht zufrieden stellend erklären kann, greift Eric Zayer auf Erkenntnisse der verhaltensorientierten Escalation-of-Commitment-Forschung zurück, um die Ursachen verspäteter Abbrüche zu identifizieren und zu strukturieren.

Download e-book for iPad: Non-Governmental Organizations and Development by David Lewis

Non-governmental companies (NGOs) are excessive profile actors within the box of foreign improvement, either as services of prone to susceptible contributors and groups and as campaigning coverage advocates. This e-book presents a serious advent to the wide-ranging subject of NGOs and improvement.

Additional resources for Behavioural Risks in Corporate Governance: Regulatory Intervention as a Risk Management Mechanism

Example text

Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 which promoted the separate legal personality principle encouraged the adoption of the company as a business organisation. 72 These descriptions gave credence to the perceived passivity associated with the role of director. A. Van den Berghe and A. A. Bryne, ‘Boardroom Changes that Could Rebuild Trust’ (Commentary in Business Week, 17 June 2002). G. J. Nicholson, ‘Evaluating Boards and Directors’ (2005) 13(5) Corporate Governance: An International Review 613–631. A discussion of relevant literature 29 74 control of organisational affairs.

Jackson [1917] 2 KB 822; Bristol and West Building Society v. Mothew [1998] Ch. 1; Kelly v. Cooper [1993] AC 205; Hilton v. Barker Booth and Eastwood [2005] UKHL 8. 90 Agents at common law owed the principal duties such as to act in the best interest of the principal, to avoid conflict of interest and to apply care and skill. These same duties are now codified under s 171–177 of the UK Companies Act 2006. In relation to the import of the agency relationship in companies at common law, see Mahony v.

Bainbridge, ‘The Business Judgement Rule as Abstention Doctrine’ (2004) 57 Vand. Law Review 83–128. 85 See for instance Regal (Hastings) Ltd v. Gulliver [1942] UKHL 1; see also Hoyt v. Y. 207; see also Ripley v. S. 2nd 269. 86 See S. Bainbridge, ‘Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance’ (2003) 97 North Western University Law Review 547; see also S. Bainbridge, ‘Director v. Shareholder Primacy in the Convergence Debate’ (2002) 16 Transnational Lawyer 45–62; see also L. Stout, ‘Bad and not-so-bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy’ (2002) 75 Southern California Law Review 1189–1209; see also Blair and Stout, (note 83).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.48 of 5 – based on 16 votes